Do the states know what is better for there future than the federal Government?
Why does it seem like the Federal Government has there foot on the gas pedal while the states are throwing the car in park while trying to smother the fire under the hood?
As it seems that while reading the news for the past couple of weeks, for some odd and unclear reason the states which in most cases are in worse condition fiscally than that of the federal Government are starting to transition most of the burden from the state level down to the local level. Why am i getting the feeling that the both the "Old School"Establishment Democratic and Republican still believe that the only way that we are going to get our selves out of this mess is by spending more, taxing more and inflating the size of the government. How are they doing this? By transitioning all liabilities from the state level on to the federal level.
Why would they be doing this? Do the states have a better chance of fixing this problem than the fat cat bureaucrats in Washington? Is Washington so out of the touch with there roots i.e there constituents back home, the same constituents that they are supposed to be representing while they are in congress? Have they worried more about what there colleagues think of them than there constituents. Has Log-rolling gone to far.
Ask yourself who is more in touch with there community. Your county supervisor or your Federal senator. Who is looking out for your best interest regardless of political party of philosophical faction. Were the founders correct when stating the two political parties were in fact meant to keep each other in check, not argue over every problem that is granted to them by the constitution. The left wing is the wing of compassion, the side of the political spectrum which decides what problems socially that are country faces. The Right Wing is the Conservation wing, the wing that makes sure that the left wing doesn't spend to much, that everything is paid for, that the left wing doesn't get bloated by spending. That the left wing doesn't have a unlimited reserve behind there checkbook. As we have seen in the past when the right wing isn't kept in check they tend to go on with business but forget about social aspects of life that arise, but in that case wouldn't that leave it to a lesser power to take it upon themselves to fix the problem wouldn't it be up to the "STATES".
Don't the states have different problems and different aspirations. Does California have the same social problems as Texas, or does Florida have the same problems fiscally as Ohio. If they do not which for some reason i believe California has different problems fiscally and socially than Ohio. I could be wrong but i believe there are some differences.
Getting back on track with my first point, Why would the Federal government continue to take on more and more if what they have on there plate is all ready emitting a disgusting odor, that would make most people throw it away and start over from scratch?
What are they trying to do, is it the new world order, the shadow government that dare I say might be right around the corner if we don't stop it. Never let a good tragedy go to waste, let it implode let it fall into a system that we have been working on for decades.
But where do we start not on the federal level people but on the local level. Bottom up, inside out. Where do we go from here, Where does it end up and what have we created by our ignorance to the idea that big government is the key.
Look forward to my next post on the similarities between welfare and seagulls..........
No comments:
Post a Comment